![]() ![]()
Since then, they have spent a lot of time and effort modularizing stuff for exactly this reason. Yes, but a highly modified XP SP3 is still not windows 95, which is what he was talking about. ![]() This would have been nice to have during the browser wars, so I could have had just the browser I was actually using installed and not wasting hard drive space back in the days of 5GB hard drives…not to mention the system resources of having a web browser open all the time for file management and shell purposes! #WINDOWS XP EMBEDDED STANDARD 2009 ISO DOWNLOAD SOFTWARE#This reduces the footprint so us embedded developers can fit the os and our software on only a small amount of disk. ![]() Not that it really matters given how the idea of MHT seems to have whithered on the vine…. Using your example Outlook Express, in nLite if I remove this I lose MHT support because removing OE removes compression library somewhere. I’d love to know how this affects the other apps. ![]() So if their product doesnt need outlook express, it doesnt get it. This allows developers to only use the parts they need from windows xp to deliver their products. The funny thing, I remember Bill Gates solemly swearing under oath that every component in Windows was intergrated so deeply with every other component that to remove anything was to break Windows. Windows Embedded Standard is a componentized version of Windows XP for embedded developers. #WINDOWS XP EMBEDDED STANDARD 2009 ISO DOWNLOAD CODE#pleaying witht he OS to learn these kind of things give you better insite on how much system recources you have to play wiht, how effecient your apps have to be, how you till chose to code them, etc… making good apps is one thing (i develop primarily for QNX and WinCE, as well as standard windows and Unix), but if you dont familiarize yourself with the environments in which you will be coding for it limits the quality of your code ot the compiler you use and your limited knowedge of the OS.Įxample, if i didnt tinker so much with it, i wouldnt have found out that i could use it as a desktop OS with everything i need and notihng i dont that boots in under 12 seconds once the computer passes POST and be able to use it on a computer that has as little as 128 megs of ram (as a desktop, the ram requirements go even lower depending on what you choose to inclode in your pachage). And I admit that installing new ROMs on my phone has been quite fun sometimes □Īs a developer, toying with as much stuff as you can only icreases your knowledge of components and operating systems and teh mechanics of those systems. #WINDOWS XP EMBEDDED STANDARD 2009 ISO DOWNLOAD FULL#I think most developers should focus on producing good apps instead of toying with systems which aren’t very useful (most of them get customized by system builders anyway so you only risk to cook something which doesn’t support full features of your system).Īpart of that, if you really want, you can obtain those modules very easily. That’s the reason why it is expensive: it is meant for system builders only.Īs a sidenote, I understand that people would like to play with that and maybe there could be a few reasons to give that stuff away for a lower price but there would be very few cases where having that would matter (releasing various custom ROMs, for example, as it happens for Smartphones today) Visual Studio already supports that and also supports testing your apps on simulators. This is completely unneeded if you only need to develop *applications* for that system. #WINDOWS XP EMBEDDED STANDARD 2009 ISO DOWNLOAD INSTALL#As of my knowledge, you only need to install this stuff to customize your embedded system installation. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |